|
Half Yearly Meeting
|
| chuckles |
Posted on 24-07-2008 15:08
|
Home From Home
Posts: 214
Joined: 07.10.07
|
Does anyone know when the half yearly meeting is going to be held? Are we going to be voting on the Winter league format, Scotch doubles or any other changes such as the minute rule?
Always have a plan 'B'
Even plan 'B' has failed |
| |
|
|
| andye |
Posted on 24-07-2008 15:14
|
Home From Home
Posts: 394
Joined: 02.10.07
|
i think you only need a stop watch option if you've only played 5 frames by a certain time! assuming 10 frame matches that is |
| |
|
|
| Viper |
Posted on 24-07-2008 16:51
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 578
Joined: 06.10.07
|
AGM (not Half Year) is scheduled for early September (as it always is) and no propositions to date have been received for the Winter League to adopt to the Summer League playing format. There has been a proposition for Scotch Doubles and this will be on the agenda. |
| |
|
|
| Sass |
Posted on 24-07-2008 21:12
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1804
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Did the proposition for Scotch Doubles include a mixed Scotch Doubles? |
| |
|
|
| Viper |
Posted on 24-07-2008 22:56
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 578
Joined: 06.10.07
|
Sass wrote:
Did the proposition for Scotch Doubles include a mixed Scotch Doubles? No it did not Sarah |
| |
|
|
| Fat-Dart |
Posted on 25-07-2008 00:04
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1308
Joined: 05.10.07
|
andye wrote:
i think you only need a stop watch option if you've only played 5 frames by a certain time! assuming 10 frame matches that is
In our match this week, Rob 'The Cougar Cat' Cogar (meow) was playing at No.1, as usual. Don't know about a stopwatch, we were considering using a calendar for some of his shots! He finally won both his games though, so clearly playing until the opponent falls asleep worked well.
 |
| |
|
|
| Sass |
Posted on 25-07-2008 00:51
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1804
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Deutch wrote:
Sass wrote:
Did the proposition for Scotch Doubles include a mixed Scotch Doubles? No it did not Sarah
Ta |
| |
|
|
| Golden |
Posted on 25-07-2008 04:39
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1641
Joined: 10.09.07
|
It was left out pending you speaking to Rileys about their previous offer |
| |
|
|
| Cue_Ball |
Posted on 25-07-2008 15:39
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 110
Joined: 09.10.07
|
Bring in the 60 seconds rule! Pweeeaase! |
| |
|
|
| Sass |
Posted on 28-07-2008 04:37
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1804
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Golden wrote:
It was left out pending you speaking to Rileys about their previous offer
Was waiting on a response from them but I'd forgotten about it to be honest. I'll chase it up.
It would make sense to table an amendment rather than a separate proposal - assuming it's your proposal can I please have a copy?
Edited by Sass on 28-07-2008 04:39 |
| |
|
|
| Golden |
Posted on 28-07-2008 19:41
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1641
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Saxton put it forward on our behalf so I'm sure he'll be happy to add it on . .
I presume the Mixed Doubles would allow cross-team pairings?
No Armani No Punani! |
| |
|
|
| Sass |
Posted on 28-07-2008 20:20
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1804
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Yes indeedy.
I think it will be ok played alongside the doubles in the same way that the ladies singles is played alongside the main singles. It might mean the odd re-arranged match but it's reasonably unlikely. Any better ideas?? |
| |
|
