|
Division 3- week 19
|
| Statto |
Posted on 16-04-2008 05:16
|
Home From Home
Posts: 362
Joined: 07.10.07
|
The Seamen 5-2 Duke of Gloucester
A game much closer than the scoreline suggests....DoG not helped by some of their players breaking down en-route, leaving them with only 4 on the night....they certainly had the best of the first four, and we were lucky to get two of them....pick again was a break followed by a dish....
Unlucky guys.... |
| |
|
|
| Cyber The Crucifier |
Posted on 16-04-2008 06:00
|
Home From Home
Posts: 284
Joined: 13.12.07
|
Royal Oak 2 Farley Loyalists 5
Frame 2 was a joke I snookered juggling spence he missed then i thought is was a foul snooker i asked both refs they said it wasn't a foul snooker so i carried on and hit the black gave him two shots and he cleared up what i should of done was asked both secretarys because they both thought it was a foul snooker but nevermind
no wonder why they call him juggling spence i know now
Frame one : close encounter
Frame Two : as above
Frame Three: we won
Frame Four: Good finish by Steve R
Frame Five ; close encounter but reliable Paul Picton came thru
Frame Six: we had chances to win it
Frame Seven: we won
Thanks Farley Loyalists good sportsman and a good side
|
| |
|
|
| Coneycueist |
Posted on 16-04-2008 06:08
|
Home From Home
Posts: 262
Joined: 05.10.07
|
If both refs agree then that's conclusive chaos to be honest, no point looking back. I can't see how a secretary has any right to have an impact on the outcome at all unless they are reffing.
The Coney: The Home of Bread and Butter pool since 1999 |
| |
|
|
| chuckles |
Posted on 16-04-2008 16:47
|
Home From Home
Posts: 214
Joined: 07.10.07
|
Secretaries can have an impact on decisions, but only if the Ref's can't agree. In this case there is no need as the Ref's were in agreement. Therefor the decision is right.
Edited by chuckles on 16-04-2008 16:51
Always have a plan 'B'
Even plan 'B' has failed |
| |
|
|
| chuckles |
Posted on 16-04-2008 16:51
|
Home From Home
Posts: 214
Joined: 07.10.07
|
The Goodies 3-4 Imperials.
Bad night for us. Should have been at least 5-2 but we couldn't finish. A pissed No' 7 shouting at our player to hurry up while he was on a shot didn't help much either.
Always have a plan 'B'
Even plan 'B' has failed |
| |
|
|
| smalton |
Posted on 16-04-2008 17:12
|
Getting The Hang Of It
Posts: 13
Joined: 07.11.07
|
PENGE CON.CLUB ?A? 4-3 JOLLY SAILOR
Went down to the final frame.
Could of gone either way
|
| |
|
|
| Shaggy |
Posted on 16-04-2008 17:29
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 888
Joined: 02.10.07
|
chaos wrote:
Royal Oak 2 Farley Loyalists 5
Frame 2 was a joke I snookered juggling spence he missed then i thought is was a foul snooker i asked both refs they said it wasn't a foul snooker so i carried on and hit the black gave him two shots and he cleared up what i should of done was asked both secretarys because they both thought it was a foul snooker but nevermind
no wonder why they call him juggling spence i know now
Frame one : close encounter
Frame Two : as above
Frame Three: we won
Frame Four: Good finish by Steve R
Frame Five ; close encounter but reliable Paul Picton came thru
Frame Six: we had chances to win it
Frame Seven: we won
Thanks Farley Loyalists good sportsman and a good side
Firstly if the referees agree then thats that.
Secondly, assuming it was close to being a foul snooker, you must have been able to see your colour full ball. Why therefore did you hit the black.....
Obviously it depends on the table position but was there no way you could aactually use two shots on your object ball...
House!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| |
|
|
| waynie1973 |
Posted on 16-04-2008 19:05
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 112
Joined: 05.10.07
|
193's 4 v 3 The Ship
A game that could have gone either way, played in good spirits with good banter throughout.
Well played the 193's
"Knowledge Dave" |
| |
|
|
| Cyber The Crucifier |
Posted on 16-04-2008 21:35
|
Home From Home
Posts: 284
Joined: 13.12.07
|
Shaggy i couldn't see both sides of my yellow
but nevermind theres always next week
|
| |
|
|
| JugglingSpence |
Posted on 16-04-2008 21:52
|
Home From Home
Posts: 271
Joined: 05.10.07
|
Just to clarify, it looked to be a foul snooker from where I was standing but when I'm playing I never look at snookers for too long as it is the refs job to decide.
There were a couple decisions that my way in that frame (and a few shots where luck got up and left altogether). One thing that we both agreed on was that we are both better players than our displays last night showed.
Good luck for the rest of the season to the Royal Oak. |
| |
|
|
| Cyber The Crucifier |
Posted on 16-04-2008 22:19
|
Home From Home
Posts: 284
Joined: 13.12.07
|
Thanks juggling
c u on the 26th april at the suzys qs
revenge is sweet lol
we need more than good luck
we r almost down we need a 7 0 against the duke of gloucester
and who knows
but the ship r twelve points above us thats alot to catch up
with three games to go |
| |
|
