|
Knockout cup
|
| jacko |
Posted on 23-06-2011 15:01
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 590
Joined: 07.03.11
|
u tried ur best wit ur slimey little chudders but then U GOT SMASHED...n as if id take nfin from the likes ov u,u got broke dished n then abused in the last...bitch |
| |
|
|
| Spud |
Posted on 23-06-2011 16:13
|
Home From Home
Posts: 468
Joined: 02.10.07
|
What a messy one this whole business is. . .
Just to clear a couple of things up though, with regards to rules being sent out to everyone, they ARE sent out to everyone, by way of everyone's secretary. They get sent everything before the season kicks off.
It's then up to the secretary and the respective venue to either have them displayed, or at the very least have them at hand in a folder somewhere to refer to in such an event as this one.
I find it hard to believe that The Farley, with the several teams playing from there, does not have a set of rules somewhere.
Also, in this day and age, this very website has them on the front page thanks to Paul, so they can be accessed quickly from anyone with a smart phone at hand....
Secondly, with reagrds to the semi final trophies we (The Eagles) are forfeiting.
It's not a case of dis-respecting the semi final acheivement, indeed, I hope we still get the call up when prompted at the presentation. It was more to ensure that Metin, in his first season for us, got the recognition of finishing joint top of the divisionals. It's a long old season, and to finish joint top after 22 league matches, only to then lose on a one frame play off is an awful kick in the nads, for any of the 4 players involved, so glad that they will all get the recognition they rightfully deserve, and glad that we were able to assist.
Back on topic, there's a meeting tomorrow night regarding the outcome of the disputed match I believe, I hope that whatever the outcome, that people can move on and enjoy the summer league for what it was inteneded, a vehicle to give us competitive pool whilst waiting for the Winter League to come round again.
Don't take it too seriousley guys...
|
| |
|
|
| Whatapisstake |
Posted on 23-06-2011 19:22
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 521
Joined: 02.12.07
|
Jacko lmao !!! What game was u watching... u must of gone to seasons past I remember u blowing the black in after it was wobbling over the corner pocket :-) take nothing away from u the 2 hours I was there I spent most of it sleeping after your 8 min plus a shot !!! Back to the topic hope this mess is sorted and as you righty say let's enjoy the rest of the season !!
am not sticking my acheivements down the list is too long lmao  |
| |
|
|
| jacko |
Posted on 24-06-2011 03:09
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 590
Joined: 07.03.11
|
wel said mr kelly...all the guys appreciate ur teams gesture concernin div1 singles trophies n ur wise words sums up our feelings...andy cum on son dont b bitter,the only chance u ad woz if i hung the black on that furry dead table,it takes me a few seconds 2 play a tactical shot n a minute or so 4 u2 try n work out a solution..i broke dishd then played 4 or 5 aggressive safetys then dishd again...sori 4not giving u a chance werent very sportin ov me i no  |
| |
|
|
| jacko |
Posted on 24-06-2011 03:09
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 590
Joined: 07.03.11
|
wel said mr kelly...all the guys appreciate ur teams gesture concernin div1 singles trophies n ur wise words sums up our feelings...andy cum on son dont b bitter,the only chance u ad woz if i hung the black on that furry dead table,it takes me a few seconds 2 play a tactical shot n a minute or so 4 u2 try n work out a solution..i broke dishd then played 4 or 5 aggressive safetys then dishd again...sori 4not giving u a chance werent very sportin ov me i no |
| |
|
|
| nuttmeg |
Posted on 24-06-2011 03:35
|
Home From Home
Posts: 423
Joined: 09.10.07
|
Brooker wrote:
I have just read this thread from start to finish & i think everyone is missing one very clear obvious point about all this & that is................
How funny is the name the Pawleyne Foulers  |
| |
|
|
| nuttmeg |
Posted on 24-06-2011 04:08
|
Home From Home
Posts: 423
Joined: 09.10.07
|
I have been in the league for over three years now and every time we draw in a final,nobody is ever sure whether 1 player should play 3 frames, 3 players should play 1 frame or 1 player should play 1 frame. We agree on the night what to play and stick to it.If the small pots played 3 frames then as far as I am concerned they have agreed to play 3 frames the Prop have won fair and square. If you play in the 4th round of the singles and you both agree on best of 5 you shouldn't then be able to phone Mark up and say you were 2-0 up after losing 3-2 and claiming the game. Final point if the Prop knew it was only one frame they wouldn't have played a very drunk Andy Shaw as their only player. |
| |
|
|
| Teach |
Posted on 24-06-2011 13:58
|
Home From Home
Posts: 484
Joined: 16.10.07
|
nuttmeg wrote:
Final point if the Prop knew it was only one frame they wouldn't have played a very drunk Andy Shaw as their only player.
I am also in support of the Prop on this occasion, but how pissed off must half their team be if a very drunk Andy Shaw still gets in the 3-man play off ahead of them (and he then lost!)
Knockout Cup Winners 2011, 2014 
Division One Summer Champs 2011, 2012, 2015 |
| |
|
|
| Shaggy |
Posted on 24-06-2011 15:59
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 888
Joined: 02.10.07
|
I was going to say the same teach. The Andy Shaw drunk thing is a complete red herring. If he was that drunk surely it would have been prudent not to pick him.
House!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| |
|
|
| dee |
Posted on 24-06-2011 17:30
|
Just Popping In
Posts: 3
Joined: 21.02.08
|
I would definately agree with you Nuttmeg, but we didn't agree to it in the sense that we all knew it was only meant to be one but DECIDED to play 3. We were TOLD it was best of 3 and when we questioned it saying that we thought it was ONLY 1 we were TOLD that THE RULE was best of 3 according to Gary who is a committee member. I personally tend to give respect to our committee members as they do need to know all the rules at all times and often give up their own time to come down to matches to referee - based on this and the fact that I've never questioned them in the past, we took this at face value based on the say so of a committee member. I hope that in the future I will not see the need to ask a committe member about a ruling and then run off to double check the rules as I would think that this was quite insulting. I don't think there is any way that you can argue that playing best of 3 was definately in favour for the Prop instead of us (as they are all much better players and it was just luck on the night that we managed to claw our way back from 5-1 down) and I do feel very sorry for Andy Shaw as even though he was drunk (from what I remember he only seemed slightly sober for his first frame of the night) because on the night he was the only player from the prop to win 2 out of 2 in the first 10 frames (which is probably why he was choosen to play first in the deciding frames, considering there were a lot of other prop players who weren't as drunk that weren't picked for the final 3). I also think that regardless of his having too many drinks, I would still be likely to put money on him winning than someone from the 4th division. At the end of the day this was only brought up to Mark H because a committee member had said one rule and we later found out this wasn't the case and wanted to clarify the rules for any future draws. He then said that it is the first to 6 which happened to be the small pots. |
| |
|
|
| Kermy |
Posted on 25-06-2011 00:19
|
Home From Home
Posts: 231
Joined: 02.12.09
|
A lot of this is being put on swetts,which is unfair. He never spoke to Cathy or any of your team,so for fcuks sake stop trying to blame other people rather than your own secretary. |
| |
|
|
| jacko |
Posted on 25-06-2011 16:36
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 590
Joined: 07.03.11
|
n the moral ov the story is...if at 1st u dont succeed lie n try again...apologies apopogies,dam lap top...meant 2b If at 1st u dont succeed try n try again  ...n 2all u cynical people out there id like 2point out that the prop did not in anyway try 2 decieve the small pots n the small pots only contacted mark 4 clarification on the rules n wer not tryin 2progress after losing..obviously...we can all now finally sleep wel again as the purity n integraty ov Croydon Pool is restored lol....actually woz no win situation 4the committee...2rongs make a rite as the sayin goes dont it  |
| |
|
|
| Blockapocket |
Posted on 25-06-2011 19:21
|
Home From Home
Posts: 374
Joined: 09.09.09
|
The league best order 16 throphys for this comp, you cant lose in this one.lol  |
| |
|
|
| Luke |
Posted on 25-06-2011 20:32
|
Home From Home
Posts: 303
Joined: 06.03.08
|
What was the outcome in the meeting last night?
Patch!  |
| |
|
|
| RasFas |
Posted on 25-06-2011 20:44
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 166
Joined: 05.10.07
|
"The Executives Committee's decision on Friday 17th June was upheld and endorsed by the membership present whereas the Farley Small Potatoes were awarded the match for their previous round fixture against The Propeller. Pat Flynn (Pond Q's) notified the league that he wished to withdraw his team from the main comp due to lack of players for a monday night and graciously offered the Pond Q's entry so that both the Farley Small Potatoes and The Propeller could continue within the competition. It was found at the EGM that both team secretaries were at fault on the evening of their match and endorsed Pat Flynns offer and re-entered The Propeller into the main competition replacing the Pond Q's."
Who'da thunk it? Pat Flynn to the rescue! |
| |
|
|
| Luke |
Posted on 25-06-2011 21:14
|
Home From Home
Posts: 303
Joined: 06.03.08
|
That makes it interesting. Who will we be playing as the draw has been done on the website, and we are down to play Small Pots/Prop. Will the draw be re done?
Patch! |
| |
|
|
| Luke |
Posted on 25-06-2011 22:16
|
Home From Home
Posts: 303
Joined: 06.03.08
|
RasFas wrote:
It was found at the EGM that both team secretaries were at fault on the evening of their match and endorsed Pat Flynns offer and re-entered The Propeller into the main competition replacing the Pond Q's."
I think that's just answered my question if that's true fran. Looks like the prop replaced pond, so we'll be playing the small pots
Patch! |
| |
|
|
| Site Team |
Posted on 26-06-2011 02:07
|
Super Admin
Posts: 329
Joined: 10.09.07
|
The draw has been updated |
| |
|
|
| andye |
Posted on 28-06-2011 18:29
|
Home From Home
Posts: 394
Joined: 02.10.07
|
i think every team should withdraw except the potatoes and the prop
then let them have a one frame play-off for the cup on the presentation night...! |
| |
|
|
| the-shark |
Posted on 28-06-2011 18:58
|
Home From Home
Posts: 432
Joined: 14.10.07
|
why is every single game at suzy Qs...? i can understand the semis and maybe final but the 2nd round...????? come off it... bit of a joke that.
we may need a bigger boat..! |
| |
|
