|
Rankings, Div Singles & Secs
|
| Sass |
Posted on 14-01-2008 06:03
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1804
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Mark Halsey has kindly provided us with the data which is now available via the links on the home page. This will be updated each weekend.
Rankings
Div Singles
Div Secs
Thanks Mark 
Edited by Sass on 20-04-2008 04:07 |
| |
|
|
| Sass |
Posted on 20-01-2008 04:33
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1804
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Updated. |
| |
|
|
| scottish-hustler |
Posted on 22-01-2008 09:27
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 193
Joined: 12.10.07
|
if i look at the monitor upside down it looks like im doing well  ne: |
| |
|
|
| Golden |
Posted on 27-01-2008 03:37
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1641
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Updated |
| |
|
|
| Sass |
Posted on 09-02-2008 22:53
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1804
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Rankings updated. |
| |
|
|
| Golden |
Posted on 18-02-2008 03:15
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1641
Joined: 10.09.07
|
All updated |
| |
|
|
| Golden |
Posted on 24-02-2008 05:07
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1641
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Updated |
| |
|
|
| Golden |
Posted on 01-03-2008 19:58
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1641
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Updated |
| |
|
|
| Golden |
Posted on 11-03-2008 05:22
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1641
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Updated |
| |
|
|
| BigJake |
Posted on 11-03-2008 22:32
|
Home From Home
Posts: 227
Joined: 06.03.08
|
why don't the rankings take account of how good a player is instead of just counting how many games they have played?
Someone that has played 10 games and won 10, will be ranked below someone that has played 30 games and won 11. That doesn't seem right... has anyone noticed this before? Is it likely to ever get changed in the future? |
| |
|
|
| nuttmeg |
Posted on 11-03-2008 23:19
|
Home From Home
Posts: 423
Joined: 09.10.07
|
to be fair if a player is signed up,you would expect them to play in a lot of frames in a season, unless 1. they don't turn up regularly in which case they are possibly not proper team mates so sod em or 2. they don't get picked much, which means they are probably not that good so I'm sure they won't really mind what their rankings are |
| |
|
|
| BigJake |
Posted on 11-03-2008 23:25
|
Home From Home
Posts: 227
Joined: 06.03.08
|
Yeah I see what you mean, not sure what the answer is really.
I don't think the rankings should be a measure of how comitted someone is to their team, I think it should be a measure of how good they are with a pool cue. On the other hand if it was a straight forward win/loss ratio you'd have the absurd situation of someone who played one game the whole season and won being above someone who played 20 and won 19 which wouldn't seem right either!  |
| |
|
|
| longshanks |
Posted on 11-03-2008 23:26
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 709
Joined: 07.10.07
|
My snooker league does it on percentages, with the proviso that you have to have played a certain number of games, which used to be 15 out of the 22 I think. |
| |
|
|
| Shaggy |
Posted on 11-03-2008 23:50
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 888
Joined: 02.10.07
|
Other leagues do it as a frame difference.
ie Played 22 won 16 Lost 6 is +10.
Played 10 Won 10 Lost 0 is +10.
My snooker league is the same as Longshnaks but there have been instances when people have said he won 11/12 I am 21/out of 24. He has a better percentage but can you be sure he would have won at least 10 if he played 12 more. Frankly no you cant be sure....
I think all have valid reasons for and against, this leagues does reward both attendance and performance.
If a footballer played half the games brilliantly and was injured or unavailable the next, he wouldn't win player of the year.
House!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| |
|
|
| miq |
Posted on 12-03-2008 00:03
|
Home From Home
Posts: 464
Joined: 05.10.07
|
We've had this before on the old site.
I think the points system for rankings is as followed.
A win for a singles, doubles and league cup games get you 5 points for each win.
In the league a win will get you 4.5 points in the 1st Division, 4.25 in 2nd, 4.00 in 3rd, 3.75 in 4th, 3.5 in 5th.
You get ranking points for winning but its structured to recognise you will be playing better players week in week out the higher the division you are in.
If two players have identical records but play in different divisions, the player in the higher division will be ranked higher then the other. |
| |
|
|
| BigJake |
Posted on 12-03-2008 00:08
|
Home From Home
Posts: 227
Joined: 06.03.08
|
OK I'm in devils advocate mood this evening.
Can't say I think that's a great system.
If you are giving extra points for playing in a higher division, why not give extra points for playing at the front of the squad? Surely it's harder to win 10/10 games if your playing first than it is if your playing last? |
| |
|
|
| BigJake |
Posted on 12-03-2008 00:21
|
Home From Home
Posts: 227
Joined: 06.03.08
|
and by the way.. would I think the system needed revision if I was first on the list? or for that matter, appeared on the first page of the list!
no... probabally not  |
| |
|
|
| Golden |
Posted on 17-03-2008 21:29
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1641
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Rankings etc have been updated . . |
| |
|
|
| Brooker |
Posted on 18-03-2008 01:20
|
Home From Home
Posts: 233
Joined: 08.10.07
|
Looking at the history of previous winners, Terry Doke, Eddie Taylor, Jason Deegan, Steve Field, Rod Altes. I think jacko has won it also.
It doesn't seem to be too far away from being right on the basis of those winners i would say.
Looking at this year, with Rod Altes & Sean Halligan having a couple of question marks against their names to be added & a Doubles final still to play, & also Danny Evans up there & still in the singles, i would say the rankings are not far off the mark this year either.
I know Graham Thompson is top & in the doubles final also, but you would have to say he deserves it if he wins it although he may not have been most peoples prediction at the start of the season.
I personally don't think there is much wrong with it. It rewards consistancy & also rewards commitment through the whole season.
I would rather be playing golf |
| |
|
|
| Golden |
Posted on 23-03-2008 07:21
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1641
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Updated |
| |
|
